Total ban of wind farms on council land 'bonkers'

The final decision to ban wind farms will rest with council leader Ken Thornber. The final decision to ban wind farms will rest with council leader Ken Thornber.

PLANS for a blanket ban on wind farms on council land in Hampshire have been condemned as “simply bonkers.”

Tory council chiefs have said while the benefits of providing clean renewable energy are recognised there are “adverse impacts” on the landscape. A county council report said the financial benefits would also be outweighed. Energy companies pay landowners large sums to lease their land for turbines - cash that could be spent on services.

The local authority is a major landowner with tenant farms, country parks and other land.

The final decision to ban wind farms and large turbines will be made by council leader Ken Thornber on January 24 as executive member for policy and resources.

A council spokesman said: “The leader will report his decision to the first full council after that.”

But Councillor Keith House, leader of the Liberal Democrat opposition group, said the decision should be made after a full council debate.

Cllr House said: “Hampshire Conservatives' position on this is quite simply bonkers. Would they rather see a nuclear power station at Fawley, or turbines in appropriate sites? “Renewal energy is an essential part of future energy security. A blanket ban is irresponsible and, frankly, stupid."

In a statement, deputy leader and environment chief Mel Kendal said: “We are completely signed-up to the benefits of low-carbon energy but believe that at the present moment large scale wind turbines on our land do not provide a sufficient benefit to justify the loss of some of Hampshire's most prized undeveloped countryside.” Liberal Democrat environment spokesman Councillor Adam Carew said “We wouldn't wish to see wind farms on areas of outstanding beauty or sites of special interest but an absolute ban is ludicrous.”

Councillor Alan Weeks, the sole Green Party member of the county council said: “The local authority could be using its land to generate renewable electricity and one way is wind farms.

“There are a lot worse eyesores. On the horizon, they can look quite spectacular and - unlike the Spinnaker Tower in Portsmouth - they generate electricity.”

The proposed ban comes as the council is drawing up a new energy strategy in a bid to cut its energy bill and carbon emissions. As reported, the local authority has been hit by a £1.4m “green tax” for carbon emissions from services such as street lighting and heating schools. The policy won't affect planning applications for wind farms on private land such as the one at Bullington Cross, north of Winchester, as city and district councils - not Hampshire - are the decision making bodies. Energy minister John Hayes has been reported as saying existing wind farm sites and those in the pipeline would be enough to meet green commitments.

But a subsequent government statement said there were no caps on wind farms or change of policy.

Energy and Climate Change Secretary Edward Davey said: “Onshore wind is one of the cheapest renewables, which is why we've been able to cut the subsidy. It has an important role to play in our energy future.”

Comments(6)

bright as a button says...
12:04pm Tue 6 Nov 12

Well done to Hampshire Council at last a council with a spine who can see the folly of wind turbines. The liberal and Green party member obviously have not researched the subject otherwise they would appreciate the harm to the landscape, wildlife and people

LittleMissCleverClogs says...
12:28pm Tue 6 Nov 12

Bonkers is exactly the right word. "Energy companies pay landowners large sums to lease their land for turbines - cash that could be spent on services." - yes, because private investment is always going to be diverted to public services, isn't it?!

These people are stuck in the Stone Age. It's about time that more people under the age of 65 and with some sense of perspective became Councillors.

800Jimbo says...
1:09pm Tue 6 Nov 12

LittleMissCleverClog
s
wrote:
Bonkers is exactly the right word. "Energy companies pay landowners large sums to lease their land for turbines - cash that could be spent on services." - yes, because private investment is always going to be diverted to public services, isn't it?!

These people are stuck in the Stone Age. It's about time that more people under the age of 65 and with some sense of perspective became Councillors.
The point is that the County Council have identified that they *could* get a revenue from energy companies to spend on services if they leased any County Council land for wind farms. But they're not going to lease the land for wind farms; Hampshire Tories are so committed to renewable energy that they don't want to see it produced on Hampshire County Council (our) land. That's some commitement.

cardinalfang says...
5:37pm Tue 6 Nov 12

The problem is that wind farms are now tainted as a scam. They never get close to theoretical efficiency and have become simply a means to channel money from the taxpayer through energy company subsidies and into landowner's pockets whilst increasing energy bills for those less able to pay. Without subsidies they are a complete non-starter financially. That's not to mention to damage to health from low frequency noise and killing of bats and birds. We need alternative energy sources, but wind power just won't provide anything like enough and is too expensive. Nuclear is the sensible option for now, or shale gas.

macbeth101 says...
5:19pm Wed 7 Nov 12

It's sad to see all these comments from misinformed Mail readers.

Wind power does work, Portugal now generates over 50% of its electrcity from renewable sources, one of the largest chunks of this being from wind turbines. In fact at some times Portugal has been able to get ALL its electricity from renewables:

http://www.bbc.co.uk
/news/science-enviro
nment-18538813

ReverendPaul says...
10:46am Fri 9 Nov 12

Having lived in the Canaries for a while, they have wind turbines there both in towns and in the country. They ensure that the energy bills are kept low and are no more a blot on the landscape than the towering chimneys we see already ,infact the turbines are more pleasing on the eye. As for the noise, this is very debatable, having lived close to a turbine, its no more than a gentle huim, nothing compared to the noise from traffic or the wind here. if the county cares about those who struggle in the current climate they will allow these wind farms and aid the reduction in energy bills for everyone.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree