Total ban of wind farms on council land 'bonkers' (From This is Hampshire)
When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
Total ban of wind farms on council land 'bonkers'
10:11am Tuesday 6th November 2012 in News
The final decision to ban wind farms will rest with council leader Ken Thornber.
PLANS for a blanket ban on wind farms on council land in Hampshire have been condemned as “simply bonkers.”
Tory council chiefs have said while the benefits of providing clean renewable energy are recognised there are “adverse impacts” on the landscape. A county council report said the financial benefits would also be outweighed. Energy companies pay landowners large sums to lease their land for turbines - cash that could be spent on services.
The local authority is a major landowner with tenant farms, country parks and other land.
The final decision to ban wind farms and large turbines will be made by council leader Ken Thornber on January 24 as executive member for policy and resources.
A council spokesman said: “The leader will report his decision to the first full council after that.”
But Councillor Keith House, leader of the Liberal Democrat opposition group, said the decision should be made after a full council debate.
Cllr House said: “Hampshire Conservatives' position on this is quite simply bonkers. Would they rather see a nuclear power station at Fawley, or turbines in appropriate sites? “Renewal energy is an essential part of future energy security. A blanket ban is irresponsible and, frankly, stupid."
In a statement, deputy leader and environment chief Mel Kendal said: “We are completely signed-up to the benefits of low-carbon energy but believe that at the present moment large scale wind turbines on our land do not provide a sufficient benefit to justify the loss of some of Hampshire's most prized undeveloped countryside.” Liberal Democrat environment spokesman Councillor Adam Carew said “We wouldn't wish to see wind farms on areas of outstanding beauty or sites of special interest but an absolute ban is ludicrous.”
Councillor Alan Weeks, the sole Green Party member of the county council said: “The local authority could be using its land to generate renewable electricity and one way is wind farms.
“There are a lot worse eyesores. On the horizon, they can look quite spectacular and - unlike the Spinnaker Tower in Portsmouth - they generate electricity.”
The proposed ban comes as the council is drawing up a new energy strategy in a bid to cut its energy bill and carbon emissions. As reported, the local authority has been hit by a £1.4m “green tax” for carbon emissions from services such as street lighting and heating schools. The policy won't affect planning applications for wind farms on private land such as the one at Bullington Cross, north of Winchester, as city and district councils - not Hampshire - are the decision making bodies. Energy minister John Hayes has been reported as saying existing wind farm sites and those in the pipeline would be enough to meet green commitments.
But a subsequent government statement said there were no caps on wind farms or change of policy.
Energy and Climate Change Secretary Edward Davey said: “Onshore wind is one of the cheapest renewables, which is why we've been able to cut the subsidy. It has an important role to play in our energy future.”
Comments(6)
LittleMissCleverClogs
says...
12:28pm Tue 6 Nov 12
These people are stuck in the Stone Age. It's about time that more people under the age of 65 and with some sense of perspective became Councillors.
800Jimbo
says...
1:09pm Tue 6 Nov 12
LittleMissCleverClogThe point is that the County Council have identified that they *could* get a revenue from energy companies to spend on services if they leased any County Council land for wind farms. But they're not going to lease the land for wind farms; Hampshire Tories are so committed to renewable energy that they don't want to see it produced on Hampshire County Council (our) land. That's some commitement.
s wrote:
Bonkers is exactly the right word. "Energy companies pay landowners large sums to lease their land for turbines - cash that could be spent on services." - yes, because private investment is always going to be diverted to public services, isn't it?!
These people are stuck in the Stone Age. It's about time that more people under the age of 65 and with some sense of perspective became Councillors.
cardinalfang
says...
5:37pm Tue 6 Nov 12
macbeth101
says...
5:19pm Wed 7 Nov 12
Wind power does work, Portugal now generates over 50% of its electrcity from renewable sources, one of the largest chunks of this being from wind turbines. In fact at some times Portugal has been able to get ALL its electricity from renewables:
http://www.bbc.co.uk
/news/science-enviro
nment-18538813
ReverendPaul
says...
10:46am Fri 9 Nov 12
bright as a button says...
12:04pm Tue 6 Nov 12