£500,000 U-turn on parking blackspots (From This is Hampshire)
When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
Residential parking blackspots targeted
1:20pm Tuesday 29th January 2013 in News By Adam Richards
MORE borough residential parking blackspots are to be tackled after council leaders did a £500,000 U-turn.
Today, Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council’s decision-making Conservative Cabinet is set to approve releasing the six-figure sum to tackle some of the worst problem parking areas in the borough.
This cash injection will dramatically increase the amount set aside to improve parking provision to £1.1million over the next four years.
The £500,000 is in addition to the annual £141,000 budget for borough-wide parking improvement programmes.
Council deputy leader Councillor Ranil Jayawardena billed the move as the “right thing for residents”, while the Labour opposition, who have campaigned on the issue, said it was a “welcome U-turn”.
It is hoped the money will speed up a sluggish rate of improvements.
Seven years ago, a list, ranked by priority, identified 385 streets that needed attention – but since it was published, fewer than 20 have been improved.
The problems of congested streets, and a chronic shortage of parking bays were highlighted by The Gazette last October.
At the time, Cllr Cathy Osselton, Conservative Cab-inet member for partnerships, insisted enough money was being spent on the issue.
And a motion presented to full council in November by the Labour opposition, calling for a £1m cash injection into the borough’s parking programme, was voted down by the Conservatives.
Presenting the new plan, Conservative borough council leader Cllr Clive Sanders said the cash injection has been influenced by the findings of the borough’s recent residents’ survey.
He said that the motion presented by the Labour opposition to release £1m was not backed by the Conservatives because the plan was “financially illiterate”. Labour had urged the council to set aside £1m of the £3.5m budget surplus the council banked during 2011-12.
“That was a paper under-spend,” said Cllr Sanders. “There was never the £1m at the time to spend which is why we voted it down.”
Labour deputy group leader Cllr Paul Harvey, who proposed the original motion, welcomed the U-turn but said it should have happened sooner.
“£500,000 is a significant uplift,” he said. “Nobody is going to say the money is not a good thing – it’s just taken them six years, a council motion, and a petition to do it. There was nothing wrong with our proposal.”
Comments(11)
AndrewRH
says...
2:14pm Tue 29 Jan 13
Something doesn't add up for the most vulnerable road users in Basingstoke.
Sam_Walker123456
says...
2:20pm Tue 29 Jan 13
robertspet8
says...
1:50pm Wed 30 Jan 13
AndrewRH
says...
2:40pm Wed 30 Jan 13
We're all people and our transport needs will vary: we might choose to walk, cycle or drive (hopefully in that order).
So you are right - places where many people walk or cycle should be treated as 'priority' as well when it comes to dealing with snow & ice.
Separation where possible in busy areas has been shown to work - pavement for walking, cycle track for riding, road for driving.
Elsewhere, we need to continue building up a culture of caring backed by the law (20mph in residential areas, overtaking safely, providing adequate parking for people who cycle, ...).
Glad to hear today in Prime Minister's questions that the government is to look into the judicial system's handling of sentencing when people kill others whilst driving dangerously (often the charge is reduced and fines like £35, or nothing!, are given).
The Guardian ran an article on 4 Jan 2013 titled: 'Can cyclists and pedestrians share the road?' which you might be interested in. It also touches upon the disabled and their safety. http://tinyurl.com/b
y86edu
robertspet8
says...
3:09pm Wed 30 Jan 13
JJ38JJ
says...
10:29am Thu 31 Jan 13
jonone
says...
12:30pm Thu 31 Jan 13
JJ38JJ wrote:What planet do you live on? Have you looked at any new build developments recently? We were lucky buying a new house to get one of the rare plots with two parking spaces, but a lot of larger, privately sold houses come with just one space. The exception inevitably is the social housing, where ALL houses come with 2 parking spaces - you'd think these would be the houses where AndrewRH's supposedly vunerable people live. However most of the social hosuing occupants park in the road in front of their houses to cut down the challenging 20 yard walk they'd otherwise need to make to their parking spaces.
A sensible person would not buy a house with an insufficient number of bedrooms and the same applies to parking places. If there are not enough for your needs buy a different house.
AndrewRH
says...
3:33pm Thu 31 Jan 13
My use of the word vulnerable has nothing to do with where you start or finish your journey, or how much money you earn or have in the bank. It is about safety.
(mind, I have more money in the bank for nice holidays now that we sold our second car and I use train/bicycle for commuting)
jonone
says...
9:03am Fri 1 Feb 13
AndrewRH
says...
9:45am Fri 1 Feb 13
I've found that since commuting by bicycle more often, that I have improved my car driving too - more aware of the hazards faced by the vulnerable bicycle rider.
Sometimes cycle paths are actually more dangerous to use than roads and so for safety's sake people choose to stay on the road. Just search the internet for some of the stupid things councils allow!
Thankfully, there are several paths around Basingstoke that are good to use - more should be encouraged - the council needs to get its finger out on this!
More people cycling => fewer cars on road => quicker journeys for those that need to drive!
Helmets may be good for sports but research tends to show they aren't necessarily all they're cracked up to be for utilitarian riding.
People in cars wear helmets when doing sport but not utilitarian commuting. Ditto many who cycle. It's worth doing some research and judging for yourself.
A couple of starting points for your research...
Misconceptions: http://tinyurl.com/c
jsyvlr
Helmets: http://www.cyclehelm
ets.org/
reader1111111 says...
1:52pm Tue 29 Jan 13