'Zero tolerance' crackdown on fly-tipping

Cllr Robert Donnell Cllr Robert Donnell

A “ROGUES gallery” that names and shames convicted fly-tippers could be part of a new crackdown on the problem in Basingstoke and Deane.

Councillor Robert Donnell, Conservative Cabinet member for the environment, has pledged a “zero tolerance” approach to fly-tipping in a bid to stamp out the crime. He has also said he wants the council to pay rewards for tip-offs that lead to criminal convictions.

But opposition councillors from Labour and the Liberal Democrats blame bulky waste collection charges for encouraging fly-tipping, and they are calling for these to be slashed to deter dumping.

The crackdown pledge comes as figures show that over the last three years, only about a third of fly-tipping incidents resulted in any kind of action from the borough council.

Enforcement action can range from a warning letter to a fixed penalty fine. And since April 2010, only nine incidents have gone all the way to court.

The figures show that: * from April 2010 to April 2011 there were 2,879 fly-tipping cases reported to the council, which led to 1,050 “enforcement actions”.

* from April 2012 to March this year, of 1,746 reports, 597 resulted in enforcement actions

Cllr Donnell said: “I want to make sure that if fly-tipping occurs, we can take the culprit to court and prosecute.

“Prosecuting is always in the public interest. Fly-tipping is against the law and should not be tolerated.”

According to the Government’s Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), which compiles its own figures, the 2,391 flytipping incidents in the borough in 2011-12 cost honest taxpayers £104,050 to be cleaned up.

More than 1,000 of these incidents were single bin bags, costing £7,273 in total to deal with.

Defra says that in 2011-12, there were 1,040 “small van-load incidents”, which cost £58,240 to remove.

In the same year, the borough council spent £27,864 on enforcement action, of which the bill for sending 554 warning letters amounted to £18,282.

Cllr Gavin James, the borough’s Liberal Democrat group leader and Eastrop ward member, believes the best way to clamp down on fly-tipping is to make it easier for people to dispose of rubbish.

He urged Cllr Donnell to slash the charge levied on residents by the borough for the collection of bulky waste, and criticised budget plans to halve the collection teams.

Cllr James said: “Charging less would be the first step. It might be worth looking to see if we do an amnesty in certain areas where there is a problem.”

Currently, the borough charges residents £20.50 to to remove between one and five items, with further charges for more waste or big items.

Cllr Paul Harvey, Labour deputy leader, echoed Cllr James’ comments. “Go with the amnesty,” he said. “I think it is more important that you have a well-run bulky waste collection service that helps people get rid of their waste in an affordable way.”

In response, Cllr Donnell dismissed calls to lower the charges. He said: “I don’t see any direct correlation between bulky waste service charges and fly-tipping.”

Comments(12)

Ding says...
11:25am Mon 11 Mar 13

How about they forget 'naming and shaming', as some people clearly have no shame and raise the fine from £62 to something more likely to put people off, £1000 for example?

Sam_Walker123456 says...
1:31pm Mon 11 Mar 13

I agree that the fine should be something to make people think twice. But I also think that they should pay the cost of the clean-up of their fly-tip. I don't think they need to offer rewards for reporting fly-tippers because two thirds of those reported do not lead to any enforcement action anyway. They need to work harder on taking action against those who have already been identified. Naming and shaming is not the answer but zero tolerance and increased penalties might be.
There are some interesting statistics hidden in the figures quoted for 2011-12:
The cost of clearing up after the 2391 incidents was £104,050 which is an average of £43.52 per incident.
For these incidents about 800 enforcement actions were taken at a total cost of £27,864. About £35 per case.
Of these enforcements 554 were just letters costing £18,282 or £33 per letter.
So it hardly cost anymore to issue a fixed fine of £62 than send a letter with no fine. So wouldn't it be better to issue fines in all cases - it wont cost much more and there will be all those extra £62 coming in!
Another question is why does it cost £33 to send a letter and only £43.52 to clear up the mess - it takes one person to type and send a letter but a vehicle manned by at least a couple of people to clear up a fly-tip. Are we paying the office staff too much or the litter pickers too little?

guywithsomesense says...
3:50pm Mon 11 Mar 13

I love the way Labour and the Liberal Democrats blame bulky waste collection charges as the reason for people fly tipping,..

What next, will they say best way to stop burglaries are to make tv's and laptops cheaper?....

I fully support a zero tolerance approach, fly tippers should be dealt with severely not have Libdem and Labour councillors defend their actions,.. ???

What a joke!

ELLIS17 says...
5:02pm Mon 11 Mar 13

This story folows the recent Court case, where the offender was fined just £62, not sufficent to pay any of the costs incurred on taking the case to Court. Once again talk a good talk without thinking the whole project through. Its our money they are spending in this crackdown which will have little overall effect on the problems of fly tipping. Firstly reduce the charges made for bulky waste collections and secondly if you want zero tolerance on this issue, ensure the levels of fines imposed are always the maximum allowed by law and insist the fly tipers are made to foot the clean up bill in full.

JJ38JJ says...
8:22am Tue 12 Mar 13

According to Defra figures nearly half the cases in the borough are single bin bags. So the local opposition cannot really blame the costs of bulk waste collection can they? It's just lazy people who can't be bothered to use their bin that council tax payers already pay to have emptied.
I wonder how much is spent cleaning up traveller sites?
Chase more cases to prosecution and increase the fines.

robertspet8 says...
12:53pm Tue 12 Mar 13

I find a good way to dispose of big bulky items for free is to place them outside my garage with a 'For Sale' sign attached. It is amazing how often they 'walk'. Anything with scrap value can be left without a sign and within a few days a white pick-up will pull-up and the driver will offer to remove the items for free. Anything which does not go within a couple of weeks I have to take to the dump.

Jonty11 says...
5:53pm Tue 12 Mar 13

Another option is freecycle - you'd be amazed at what other people would like...your rubble is someone else's preparation for an extension, you're old bedding is perfect for your local animal charities etc.

And if (as was quoted) the majority is waste in black bin liners - that is without excuse - Basingstoke and Deane are the only council in the county to have bin collections once a week (the rest cope quite well thanks with once every two weeks)

So with double the collection of just about everyone else in the county do you still manage to be lazy enough not to deal with your waste properly?

Just a thought!

robertspet8 says...
12:11pm Wed 13 Mar 13

I agree with almost everything you say Jonty11. The one minor point I would pick you up on is your use of the word 'lazy'. I would find it very inconvenient to put my rubbish in a bag and then take it to some remote hedgerow to fly tip. It would be far easier to out into my rubbish bin at home! So the words I would use are 'stupid and ignorant' but not 'lazy'.

Cynical Reader says...
1:27pm Wed 13 Mar 13

If you put a skip outside your house, it will soon fill with other people's junk.
The Council should place a skip at various locations, say once every four months, for public use.
The cost would soon be saved.

JJ38JJ says...
8:22am Thu 14 Mar 13

Cynical Reader wrote:
If you put a skip outside your house, it will soon fill with other people's junk. The Council should place a skip at various locations, say once every four months, for public use. The cost would soon be saved.
The Council do provide one large facility just as you describe - it's in Wade Road. Unless you put a skip on every street corner what makes you think the lazy of Basingstoke are any more likely to take their rubbish to a skip rather than Wade Road?

Cynical Reader says...
11:16am Thu 14 Mar 13

It's not the "lazy" who even bother to fly-tip.
They just drop everything where they are.
It's more likely pikeys (oops, not PC).

robertspet8 says...
12:26pm Fri 15 Mar 13

I thought The Gazette had barred all posters of false, abusive or malicious comments, but clearly I was wrong.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree