News RSS Feed


Ford's Future in Southampton Paul Poolton Hannah Foster Murder Trial Echo Forums


Victory for phone mast campaigners

10:54am Saturday 23rd February 2008

comment Comments (11)   Have your say »


JUBILANT residents have scored a major victory in their campaign to pull the plug on a plan to put a phone mast near their homes.

As reported by the Daily Echo, a move by Vodafone to put a 14m mast on a green near the busy Bournemouth Road and Leigh Road junction in Chandler's Ford caused a storm of protest.

But now the mast plan has been crushed after councillors unanimously rejected the application.

Residents, pictured, launched their campaign a year ago when they spotted a notice about the proposed mast on a lamppost.

The proximity of the proposed mast to homes sparked worries over health implications. It would have also been near a filling station where mobile phone users are asked not to use their phones while filling their tanks.

Residents wanted to know where maintenance vehicles, called to check the mast, would park at the busy traffic lights.

Eastleigh councillors had considered a report from planning officer Clare Martin who said that the excessive height of the mast would have had an overbearing effect not only on the street scene but within the wider locality.

The controversial planning application had been referred to the local area committee for a full debate following a move by Councillor Godfrey Olson.

After the meeting he said: "I am very pleased that it was refused.

It was the most inappropriate place to have a mast at a busy junction where there is already a great deal of street furniture.

"Together with all the boxes that are needed for the mast it would have been an absolute eyesore."

A Vodafone spokesman said: "We will undertake a thorough review of the decision notice from the local authority before taking any decision on whether we will appeal or look for a new site.

"There is still a need to improve the 3G coverage for our customers in the surrounding area."


Your Say YourThis is Hampshire

O2, Romsey says...
11:05am Sat 23 Feb 08

Ludites

Adrian Smith, says...
11:53am Sat 23 Feb 08

I thought masts of this type were permitted development? Is it a few metres too high?

And this makes me laugh:-

"Residents wanted to know where maintenance vehicles, called to check the mast, would park at the busy traffic lights."

Presumably the same place that the traffic light maintenance vehicles park when they replace faulty light bulbs.

Denzil, Romsey says...
12:04pm Sat 23 Feb 08

This is a disgrace, I bet every single one of those planks has a mobile in their pocket. These peoople disgust me.

Ian, Turkey says...
2:59pm Sat 23 Feb 08

I assume then these people do not have phones, or if they do, they are hypocritical in using them knowing the masts are outside somebody elses house.

paul b, says...
3:41pm Sat 23 Feb 08

Denzil wrote:
This is a disgrace, I bet every single one of those planks has a mobile in their pocket. These peoople disgust me.
Exactly, if we had lots more masts they would all be lower power, however thanks to the stupid short sighted nimby we have only a few high powered ones.

Great job guys

Derek, Dibden Purlieu says...
6:42pm Sat 23 Feb 08

I can't seem to get a signal!!!

toby the toilet chain, says...
1:32am Sun 24 Feb 08

oh know! I think we have 2 nimbys in force now, paul b and denzil. jesus help me.

paul b, says...
4:57am Sun 24 Feb 08

i can the the honky tonk. back to life, back to reality and swing me by the nolans. Oh yeh and chirpy chiry cheepcheep.

Yasmin Skelt, says...
11:37am Sun 24 Feb 08

Fantastic news - Eastleigh Council has done a brilliant job of protecting public health given the latest press and scientific reports. Readers should check out the "Summary for the Public" in the international BioInitiative Report www.bioinitiative.or
g or at least read a few paragraphs about the delayed "Interphone Study" in Microwave News at www.microwavenews.co
m.
The "mast huggers" who wrote comments in support of the mast should read up on the dangers, especially if they are heavy mobile phone users or work for the mobile phone industry.

ann mobley, says...
12:18pm Sun 24 Feb 08

Well done to the councillors.
I would ask the negative respondents to read some of the research papers, that prove that exposure to EMfs can cause health problems to a percentage of the population. The precaution approuch to this technology is essential.

Andy, Locks Heath says...
12:48pm Mon 25 Feb 08

Once again I have to go into battle when morons who with no scientific understanding quote selective evidence from the internet to support their pre-existing prejudice. If there was a clear danger from mobile phone radiation it would be statistically significant around every mast in direct proportion to distance and time in proximity. There is always statistical variance in any population and creaming off the 99th percentile (as these reports always do) is pandering to the, confused, the prejudiced and the illiterate. And the mathematical argument which nobody can dispsute is sitting in the pockets of most protesters. Ask any protester which does the most harm - the mast a hundred metres away or the mobile pressed to the side of their own head? Invetably they think the mast is more dangerous yet they expect quoting a spurious internet reference they cannot interpret for themselves somehow gives them credibility in the debate. "Research" is not just trawling seelctively through dubious raw material - expecially when it originates in the USA. Example - There are a dozen or so people die of bee stings in the UK every year - if one of these occurs near a mobile phone mast do we conclude that mobile phone masts send bees into a killing frenzy? Well Yes - if you ignore all the other deaths which would show up the one death as being entirely random!

Comments are closed on this article.

Video News Food & Restaurant Reviews

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »