News RSS Feed


Ford's Future in Southampton Paul Poolton Hannah Foster Murder Trial Echo Forums


Help us save vital harbour

7:17am Tuesday 10th June 2008

comment Comments (7)   Have your say »


CAMPAIGNERS fighting to save Lymington Harbour have issued a rallying cry to back the installation of multi-million pound breakwaters.

The town's Harbour Commission has applied for consent to start what would be a major engineering project at the mouth of Lymington River.

Now they are begging the thousands of boat owners who use the renowned yachting area to get behind the sea defence scheme.


CLICK HERE TO READ THE REPORTS

Experts say the 12-acre salt marsh which protects the harbour, could disappear in 30 years unless urgent action is taken.

The plan is to create two breakwaters at the mouth of Lymington River to shield the harbour from the full force of the sea's waves. It would mean a 180m rock construction on one side of the estuary and a 200m equivalent on the other.

Getting the go-ahead for the scheme hinges on gathering mass support and convincing a number of key regulatory bodies that such an undertaking would be beneficial.

Harbour Commission chiefs are distributing template letters to mooring holders, members of the Royal Lymington Yacht Club and Lymington Yacht Haven users as they lobby the Marine and Fisheries Agency of DEFRA and Natural England.

The letter to Natural England states: "This scheme is vital to the future viability of the harbour and to the well-being of Lymington and the surrounding district.

"Without the protection afforded by the breakwaters, most of the moorings that support leisure and commercial marine activities in the harbour will be lost. Without these, many of our local businesses that rely on the marine activities will be unable to continue, and leisure users will lose a valuable recreational facility."

Last year thousands showed their support for the scheme and campaigners are hoping for a similar wave of backing in the coming weeks.

The exact cost of the project, which could take up to 20 years to complete in a six phase process, has yet to be revealed. It would require the blessing of DEFRA, the Environment Agency and the New Forest National Park Authority.

Natural England, whose support could be crucial in determining whether the plan gets the go-ahead, is due to make its recommendation in July.


Your Say YourThis is Hampshire

vegasaint, HATING SKATES says...
11:57am Tue 10 Jun 08

Come on then own up who has nicked the ambulance from the picture

live local, Southampton says...
12:19pm Tue 10 Jun 08

The last time a project of this magnitude was proposed it had Royal approval unfortunately King Canute had no better luck at turning back the tide.

Several factors come into play when considering the loss of the salt flats.

1 isostatic readjustment, following the last ice age about 10,00 years ago the UK has been slowly tilting as the weight of ice bearing down on the UK reduced, all along the south coast sea levels are rising as the land is sinking, with the opposite effect in Scotland. (Could be interesting for the long term property values in Portsmouth)

2 Global warming,
Whilst it is possible that global warming is occurring this could still be the after effects of the ice age either way sea levels are rising and areas on the coast line will be lost.

3 The loss of source material to replace the sand and mud that is washed away. The costal protection schemes in Milford and new Milton prevent beach materials from being moved along the beach cutting off the supply of new material to repair the flats.

In short this is a failed project and will cost more year on year and it would be better to let nature take its course, rather than throwing good money after bad.

Harry Remmington, New Forest says...
12:27pm Tue 10 Jun 08

What happened to the connection of this to the larger new IOW
ferries ?

J, Holbury says...
12:35pm Tue 10 Jun 08

If the RLYC / Lymington Yacht Haven want this work done, then they can pay for it. Why should taxpayers contribute to something that benifits mainly well-off yacht owners? They already get free recovery when they run aground after too much pimms.

Gerry, says...
1:36pm Tue 10 Jun 08

Now, I know a bit about this. It is vital that this goes ahead, without such pritection the harbour will become unsustainable, already one has to choose one ruturn the the harbour with care. If the people of Lymington and the new forest want to continue to benefit from the cashe of of funds generated by this port, they should be out on the streets, supporting this move.

Arnold McTavish (troll), Lymington River Bridge (beneath) says...
1:45pm Tue 10 Jun 08

I thought as much, flouride in our water and now this, break waters at the mouth of the River. It's nothing but a communist plot!!

wild bill, millbrook hou.est says...
1:20pm Sat 14 Jun 08

to me i think it should be up to the people that born,live, and stay there living there every day of there lives,not the ones who you only see a few weeks of a year
like:- live local post said you will be wasting time and money this would only be for the short term,best thing to do is let nature do its work and keep dredging the channel out

Comments are closed on this article.

Click on the links to read the report in full Photograph of the designated saltmarsh

Click on the links to read the report in full

Photograph of the designated saltmarsh



Sponsored Links


Video News Food & Restaurant Reviews

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »