When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
10:44pm Wednesday 20th May 2009 in News
By Clare Kennedy, Health Reporter
GOSPORT MP Peter Viggers claimed £30,000 of taxpayer funded expenses on his garden- including £1,645 on a floating duck island for his pond, it has been revealed tonight.
He is to stand down at the next general election over the expenses row.
Conservative party leader David Cameron said he would remove the party whip from the MP if he did not stand down at the election.
Mr Viggers has defended his expenses saying they were in accordance with the rules and approved by the fees office.
Comments(7)
spyke
says...
11:24pm Wed 20 May 09
Bright Spark
says...
12:09am Thu 21 May 09
Vonnie
says...
5:31am Thu 21 May 09
Andy Locks Heath
says...
7:32am Thu 21 May 09
Vonnie wrote:It is not consistently ignored - it has been cited almost every time the issue is discussed. SO we can forgive every MP for fleecing a system for applying the letter rather than the spirit? How are these people supposed to excercise any moral authority over us? They police themselves and are on trust to do so. PM's created, update and administer these rules - they are not imposed externally, they are maintained by parliament itself. I would like to introduce my own rules for avoiding income tax. Am I allowed to? Commentators have said for weeks that saying expenses are "within the rules" is no defence - in fact it is the kind of immoral non-excuse used by someone who cannot justify what they have done in any other way.
The point that seems to constantly be ignored in most of reports such as this is that most of those expenses so far reported of all MP's have been " in accordance with the rules and approved by the fees office."
Yes, those that wasted money in the way reported should be pilloried for their lack of conscience, but it is the system that is wrong, and I don't see Mr Brown changing it much, despite his protestations to the contrary.
Andy Locks Heath
says...
7:33am Thu 21 May 09
D'Arcy Sarto
says...
8:11am Thu 21 May 09
Andy Locks Heath wrote:Well said Andy.
Vonnie wrote: The point that seems to constantly be ignored in most of reports such as this is that most of those expenses so far reported of all MP's have been " in accordance with the rules and approved by the fees office." Yes, those that wasted money in the way reported should be pilloried for their lack of conscience, but it is the system that is wrong, and I don't see Mr Brown changing it much, despite his protestations to the contrary.It is not consistently ignored - it has been cited almost every time the issue is discussed. SO we can forgive every MP for fleecing a system for applying the letter rather than the spirit? How are these people supposed to excercise any moral authority over us? They police themselves and are on trust to do so. PM's created, update and administer these rules - they are not imposed externally, they are maintained by parliament itself. I would like to introduce my own rules for avoiding income tax. Am I allowed to? Commentators have said for weeks that saying expenses are "within the rules" is no defence - in fact it is the kind of immoral non-excuse used by someone who cannot justify what they have done in any other way.
Search for Jobs
Search Now »
Find the right person for you
Search Now »
Search for Homes
Search Now »
Search for Cars
Search Now »
Linesman says...
11:21pm Wed 20 May 09
How he has the nerve to attempt to defend his actions defies belief.
Why wait until the next election, he should go NOW!
I bet he voted to sack the speaker.