News RSS Feed


Gosport MP Peter Viggers claimed expenses for floating duck island

Peter Viggers Peter Viggers

GOSPORT MP Peter Viggers claimed £30,000 of taxpayer funded expenses on his garden- including £1,645 on a floating duck island for his pond, it has been revealed tonight.

He is to stand down at the next general election over the expenses row.

Conservative party leader David Cameron said he would remove the party whip from the MP if he did not stand down at the election.

Mr Viggers has defended his expenses saying they were in accordance with the rules and approved by the fees office.

Comments(7)

Linesman says...
11:21pm Wed 20 May 09

When many families in his constituency have to live on considerably less than what he is claiming on expenses, he is clearly out of touch with them.

How he has the nerve to attempt to defend his actions defies belief.

Why wait until the next election, he should go NOW!

I bet he voted to sack the speaker.


spyke says...
11:24pm Wed 20 May 09

It's time to get all these over educated buffoons out along with their political parties and get some common sense independent MPs back in the House of Commons.

I can't wait to see the expense claims from our retired over educated buffoons in the unelected House of Lords !!

Bright Spark says...
12:09am Thu 21 May 09

I think that he should be praised for making an island for floating ducks, but how about arm bands for those that do not swim so well?

Vonnie says...
5:31am Thu 21 May 09

The point that seems to constantly be ignored in most of reports such as this is that most of those expenses so far reported of all MP's have been " in accordance with the rules and approved by the fees office."
Yes, those that wasted money in the way reported should be pilloried for their lack of conscience, but it is the system that is wrong, and I don't see Mr Brown changing it much, despite his protestations to the contrary.

Andy Locks Heath says...
7:32am Thu 21 May 09

Vonnie wrote:
The point that seems to constantly be ignored in most of reports such as this is that most of those expenses so far reported of all MP's have been " in accordance with the rules and approved by the fees office."
Yes, those that wasted money in the way reported should be pilloried for their lack of conscience, but it is the system that is wrong, and I don't see Mr Brown changing it much, despite his protestations to the contrary.
It is not consistently ignored - it has been cited almost every time the issue is discussed. SO we can forgive every MP for fleecing a system for applying the letter rather than the spirit? How are these people supposed to excercise any moral authority over us? They police themselves and are on trust to do so. PM's created, update and administer these rules - they are not imposed externally, they are maintained by parliament itself. I would like to introduce my own rules for avoiding income tax. Am I allowed to? Commentators have said for weeks that saying expenses are "within the rules" is no defence - in fact it is the kind of immoral non-excuse used by someone who cannot justify what they have done in any other way.

Andy Locks Heath says...
7:33am Thu 21 May 09

whoops MPs not PMs. It was early.

D'Arcy Sarto says...
8:11am Thu 21 May 09

Andy Locks Heath wrote:
Vonnie wrote: The point that seems to constantly be ignored in most of reports such as this is that most of those expenses so far reported of all MP's have been " in accordance with the rules and approved by the fees office." Yes, those that wasted money in the way reported should be pilloried for their lack of conscience, but it is the system that is wrong, and I don't see Mr Brown changing it much, despite his protestations to the contrary.
It is not consistently ignored - it has been cited almost every time the issue is discussed. SO we can forgive every MP for fleecing a system for applying the letter rather than the spirit? How are these people supposed to excercise any moral authority over us? They police themselves and are on trust to do so. PM's created, update and administer these rules - they are not imposed externally, they are maintained by parliament itself. I would like to introduce my own rules for avoiding income tax. Am I allowed to? Commentators have said for weeks that saying expenses are "within the rules" is no defence - in fact it is the kind of immoral non-excuse used by someone who cannot justify what they have done in any other way.
Well said Andy.
MPs should be leading by example.


click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree