News RSS Feed


Child minder convicted over pile-up on M27

Charlotte Gardiner Charlotte Gardiner

A CHILD minder was responsible for a horrific nine-car smash on a Hampshire motorway that left another motorist with severe head injuries, a court has ruled.

Charlotte Gardiner, 20, was convicted of careless driving after the pile-up which left two cars on their roofs and the westbound carriageway of the M27 between Hedge End and Eastleigh being closed for about ten hours.

David Kirk, a supermarket warehouse worker, from Bitterne, Southampton, spent four weeks in intensive care fighting for his life following the crash last October.

Click below to see a video of today's headlines in sixty seconds

Southampton magistrates heard that Gardiner, of Buttercup Lane, Hedge End, lost control of her black Ford Fiesta, which she had owned for about a month, because she was chatting to her front seat passenger about text messages the latter was sending and receiving and not concentrating on the road.

Magistrates were told how she swerved to her left, hit the nearside barrier, rebounded onto the three-lane carriageway to hit the opposite barrier. Gardiner claimed she had swerved to avoid a car that suddenly cut in front of her.

Imposing a fine of £175 with £200 costs, magistrates’ chairman Ivy Fisher said: “Having considered all the evidence very carefully, we consider the manner of your driving fell below that of a proven driver because your response to the presence of the other vehicle was inappropriate which resulted in you losing control of your vehicle.”

Gardiner said she was doing about 65-70mph in the middle lane when she saw a car on her inside, which suddenly cut in front of her. She also thought she saw an object on the road and swerved to her left to avoid crashing into the vehicle.

In mitigation, David Harby, defending, said she had suffered bruising and whiplash and her car was written off.

Gardiner’s front-seat passenger, student Purying Tang said they had spent about three hours that evening in the Hampshire Boulevard pub in Portsmouth. As Gardiner drove her home to Romsey, she text messages to friends on their phones.

She said neither of them had drunk anything alcoholic that night and Gardiner had not used her mobile phone.

After the hearing, Mr Kirk – who spent six weeks in hospital, including four in a coma in intensive care – told the Daily Echo he was still unable to drive, could only work three days a week and suffered from fatigue. “Only time will tell whether I will make a full recovery.”

Scrapped His wife, Georgina, had been due to finish her nursing job on a cardiac high depency unit at Southampton General Hospital the day after the accident for promotion to the intensive care ward at the Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Winchester, but that had to be scrapped and she had been forced to reduce her hours to help look after their young daughter.

Comments(22)

Derek of Dibden Purlieu says...
10:57am Tue 29 Sep 09

She's a bit of a munter and would probably scare any kids that she has to look after.

Stupideditor says...
11:56am Tue 29 Sep 09

Derek of Dibden Purlieu wrote:
She's a bit of a munter and would probably scare any kids that she has to look after.
If i read this right she only got away with a light fine.

This is no deterant for those who persistantly drive without due care and attention especially if a mobile is said cause

jammyswine says...
12:03pm Tue 29 Sep 09

In mitigation, David Harby, defending, said she had suffered bruising and whiplash and her car was written off

How is this mitigation? Surely mitigation is the reasons behind an incident which lessen any punishment, not the consequences of her own actions?

Ridiculous sentancing as well, especially as she made up a stupid story to cover her tracks!

Nearly an OAP says...
1:12pm Tue 29 Sep 09

Did she have relatives on the Bench to get away with a light fine or was the magistrates' chairman a muppet too.

jammyswine says...
1:45pm Tue 29 Sep 09

Further to my earlier comment, were no penalty points added? The only punishment I can see is the paltry fine.

Miles Way says...
1:50pm Tue 29 Sep 09

And the Asian chap selling £1 rip off DVDs in a pub gets jail time
Not saying she should have been jailed but anyone else think there's a bit of disparity with sentencing?

Lol sw - MISS-TAKE

jono1974 says...
2:23pm Tue 29 Sep 09

You would think with the serious accident and injuries this idiot caused to a family man she wouldnt pull such a stupid smirk, also i think at least a life driving ban and larger fine, its all very well she made a mistake but this punishment is not enough, she has got away with it.

yummy_mummy says...
3:59pm Tue 29 Sep 09

jammyswine wrote:
Further to my earlier comment, were no penalty points added? The only punishment I can see is the paltry fine.
She'll find it very difficult to pass a CRB check now and will therefore find it very difficult to childmind in the future.
Sod the points.... she should be banned from driving.

Sir Ad E Noid says...
4:51pm Tue 29 Sep 09

Charlotte is a cheeky chappy, sorry girlie, her smirk let you all know she got away with it. Causing that much mayhem and serious injury is one thing. Trying to cover her tracks with the most useless, pathetic lie, sorry excuse, is another. Lets hope she is prevented from working in her choosen profession as this seems to be the only punishment for the carnage and misery she caused. Useless.

Saints Mike says...
4:56pm Tue 29 Sep 09

yummy_mummy wrote:
jammyswine wrote:
Further to my earlier comment, were no penalty points added? The only punishment I can see is the paltry fine.
She'll find it very difficult to pass a CRB check now and will therefore find it very difficult to childmind in the future.
Sod the points.... she should be banned from driving.
An absolutely disgusting sentence,,,people die on our roads every day because of idiots like her,,,£375 costs and fine sends out the wrong message,,, The magistrate's should go and talk to people who have lost family and friends to how they feel before giving lenient sentences like this.

What about the bloke who ended up in ICU I bet he lost more than £375

I don't think driving offences need to be declared on a enhanced CRB check

yummy_mummy says...
5:29pm Tue 29 Sep 09

Saints Mike wrote:
yummy_mummy wrote:
jammyswine wrote: Further to my earlier comment, were no penalty points added? The only punishment I can see is the paltry fine.
She'll find it very difficult to pass a CRB check now and will therefore find it very difficult to childmind in the future. Sod the points.... she should be banned from driving.
An absolutely disgusting sentence,,,people die on our roads every day because of idiots like her,,,£375 costs and fine sends out the wrong message,,, The magistrate's should go and talk to people who have lost family and friends to how they feel before giving lenient sentences like this. What about the bloke who ended up in ICU I bet he lost more than £375 I don't think driving offences need to be declared on a enhanced CRB check
I was commenting on the fact that the fine won't be her only punishment and I was not passing judgement on the sentence itself. I totally agree that she should have been punishment far more severe then she actually was but would ask you to please read posts carefully before you brand them 'disgusting'. And FYI driving offences are included in a CRB check.

King Mush says...
7:32pm Tue 29 Sep 09

jono1974 wrote:
You would think with the serious accident and injuries this idiot caused to a family man she wouldnt pull such a stupid smirk, also i think at least a life driving ban and larger fine, its all very well she made a mistake but this punishment is not enough, she has got away with it.
Smirking for the camera? Maybe she is hoping to get onto a reality TV show and probably has Max Clifford drawing up a lucrative contract.

Maybe the final Big Brother 2010 along with other misfits?


Pathetic 'sentence' and lucky that she didnt cause multiple deaths by distractions of texting, yakking, steroeo-pumping, eating, drinking, smoking or any other 'habits' that seem to go on at high speed

Sir Ad E Noid says...
7:54pm Tue 29 Sep 09

Yummy Mummy, I think you need to read the posts again. Everybody was agreeing with what you said about Miss Piggy. Please don't shout back at me, I've got a headache.

10 Minute Man says...
8:11pm Tue 29 Sep 09

We don't know if she was telling the truth, or just unable to react to a very sudden driver pulling out which nobody would have been able to avoid.

At worse she might have been paying insufficient attention and lied about what happened.

Either way it was an accident, not a deliberate act. Clearly she was insured (otherwise there would be much foaming at the mouth here) - so the other injured parties will get *something* as compensation, though obviously they'd rather nothing happened in the first place.

StEmmosfire says...
8:28pm Tue 29 Sep 09

Nearly an OAP wrote:
Did she have relatives on the Bench to get away with a light fine or was the magistrates' chairman a muppet too.
She is a Gardiner, lots of them in the Freemasons.

yummy_mummy says...
9:07pm Tue 29 Sep 09

Sir Ad E Noid wrote:
Yummy Mummy, I think you need to read the posts again. Everybody was agreeing with what you said about Miss Piggy. Please don't shout back at me, I've got a headache.
Note to self.... must not try and cook tea, tidy up, read homework books, hoover and get washing in whilst commenting on the Daily Echo website.

Apologies Saints Mike, after a glass of wine I've re-read your post and totally agree!

rmw says...
10:05pm Tue 29 Sep 09

The same photo of Charlotte was used back in January 2009 - so it is an archive picture.

Also, for the record, I see people every day driving too fast, using mobiles etc.,. some are quite brazen about it too!

The Grey Mystery says...
1:30am Wed 30 Sep 09

at least this case made it to court, so many get away with just having to take driving classes and are back driving a long time before their VICTIMS have recovered and are able to work again

Major Sir Jerry Pending says...
8:50am Wed 30 Sep 09

What was she doing hogging the middle lane at 65mph anyway - maybe that's why the guy overtook her on the inside and cut in. Typical woman driver! She should have been banned then she might have had to walk a bit more and get some execise to lose weight.

S Gardiner says...
10:26am Wed 30 Sep 09

StEmmosfire, Woolston says...
8:28pm Tue 29 Sep 09

Nearly an OAP wrote:
Did she have relatives on the Bench to get away with a light fine or was the magistrates' chairman a muppet too.
She is a Gardiner, lots of them in the Freemasons.

Proves how nasty some people can be, calling names like miss piggy and assuming things just because of the surname. What you people need to think about is how you would feel if the man that was in hospital was part of your family?? and then think about how you would feel if the person that caused the accident was your family? either way none of them can win coz you would be annoyed if the man that was in icu was family and she got away with a fain eand points but then if she was your family you would be happy that she had got away so lightly. theres no need for name calling and im not taking no sides but just think before you comment!!!

jammyswine says...
12:36pm Wed 30 Sep 09

^^^^
Oh, I think you are taking sides my friend.

S Gardiner says...
1:54pm Tue 6 Oct 09

jammyswine wrote:
^^^^ Oh, I think you are taking sides my friend.
If you read the post properly you would understand there is no side to take, you are damned if you do and you are damned if you dont!! The point I was trying to make is that there is no need for personal attacks, assumptions or name calling. Comment on the facts not what people look like or what their last name is. Just proves how shallow some people are!!!

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree