Sport RSS Feed


Southampton FC will not lose points over parent company's impending administration


SAINTS will not be deducted ten points, even if the club's parent company goes into administration.

The Daily Echo contacted the Football League this morning to confirm whether or not the club would be hit by a points penalty.

And a spokesman confirmed that the club would not be docked points if SLH went into administration, as is widely expected.

Click below to see a video of today's headlines in sixty seconds

He said: “Let’s be very clear, if the club goes into administration the club will be deducted 10 points.

“But if the holding company goes into administration then they won’t be.”

“The league rules are very specific, it has to be the club which goes into administration for points to be deducted.

“At the end of the day the Football League applies it’s rules and they specifically state it is the club that has to go into administration before points are deducted.”

Derby County provided the precedent which has seen Saints avoid a 10-point deduction for their parent company going into administration.

Back in October 2003, when ex-Saints boss George Burley was in charge at Pride Park, the Rams' parent company Derby County PLC were taken into receivership by the Co-op bank with debts of around £30m.

But Derby County Football Club, a seperate organisation under the umbrella of the Derby County PLC company, were not taken into administration and had no points deduction.

Within minutes of Derby County Ltd going into receivership, a consortium took over from them and that company ceased to exist.


Your Say YourHampshire

chip eater, fair pak says...
10:00am Wed 1 Apr 09

lowe is as slippery as an eel and this whole thing stinks like one.
please leave my club so i and thousands of others can go back.

Treas, Sholing says...
10:01am Wed 1 Apr 09

Well played Rupert Lowe! Another piece of inventive business acumen.Eat your hearts out ant-Lowe brigade!

Charlie George's Lawnmower, Soton says...
10:05am Wed 1 Apr 09

But the football club can't operate without the PLC!!!!!!!!

So how can the club pay wages or bills because I bet all the bank accounts are in the name of Southampton Leisure Holdings.

I fully expect the above statement from the Football League to change when they've looked into the detail.

For a start, if Saints get away with this, all the clubs who have had points deducted will probably threaten the FL with legal action etc.

I'm pretty sure Luton town were owned by a "holding company" and it didn't stop them getting points taken off.

San Marco, says...
10:13am Wed 1 Apr 09

Surely the Echo wouldn't find it amusing to print this as an April Fool's joke would they? If it is true though it only provides hope if new money comes in (see the Lawnmower's perceptive comments above).

By the way - no one has told the official site that all this is going on...
(security word: plus-bank - ha ha ha ha ha...)

St.Yorkie, Pocklington says...
10:17am Wed 1 Apr 09

Curious statement and explains why SLH didn't go into administration last week.
Perhaps now it's time for all those STs to stump up next years money to save the club - without Rupert Lowe?
Breaking news later today..."I came back and saved your club" Rupert's mantra for the fans.
S*d off Rupert and leave us alone to do a Luton!

Martin Orford, Bishops Waltham says...
10:22am Wed 1 Apr 09

This only confirms what we've all known for years - Rupert Lowe must surely be one of the most incompetent businessmen ever to manage a PLC. But it's not all his fault; equal responsibility must be shared by all the muppets on the board who have stood by and supported his reign of madness.


Saints since '57, Nursling says...
10:30am Wed 1 Apr 09

There are just too many unknowns in this process for most of us to make meaningful statements. The Lowe luvvies and haters will continue to make their own case but most of us real and loyal fans are still going to turn up on Saturday to support the team regardless. We have no control of what will happen to the PLC but we can be the 12th man on Saturday and help get 3 essential points. Most of us are fans of the club not of Lowe/wilde/PLC.

Major Sir Jerry Pending, Ward 10 says...
10:33am Wed 1 Apr 09

"Saints will sensationally avoid.." Hardly sensational since Derby did it before!! Still - how ironic that the set up that's provided the main obstacle to any take over of the football club and new investment should prove to be the thing that prevents a 10 point deduction.

Solent Saint, Lee on the Solent says...
10:33am Wed 1 Apr 09

Good on you Rupert, pulled one over the thicko class warriors. Lets all support our team on Saturday. All we are saying is'give Saints a chance'

saint Compo, Winchester says...
10:36am Wed 1 Apr 09

If the PLC (parent company) goes into administration, it will be the aim of its Administrator (an insolvency specilaist) to find new funding for the PLC or a buyer for the club (subsidiary company).

Unfortunately, it's not going to be easy to find either in such difficult economic times.

All those who have withheld their support of the club in the last year (by not going to games at St Mary's) should be ashamed of themselves. They are the main problem, not Lowe who has tried hard to retrieve a dreadful financial deficit situation created in the 2 years he was no longer Chairman of the PLC. This is notwithstanding his errors in the previous couple of years, especially the comings and goings of so many managers.

If our football club goes to the wall, the disaffected fans carry a huge part of the blame.

Those of you still gloating in the club's demise because you hate Lowe are fools - real fools, not just April ones.

COYR

St.Yorkie, Pocklington says...
10:37am Wed 1 Apr 09

Class - the man wouldn't know class if it smacked him in the face. Having class is more than living in Gloucester and wearing tweed, and having chums in The City!
Football is a working class sport hijacked by the midle classes to exploit the "poor working class man". I don't class my self at all - just get on with it to the best of my ability. When did Rupes last do a fair days work?

martin van tuyl, poole says...
10:50am Wed 1 Apr 09

Living in Poole, many of my friends are Bournemouth supporters and they are bravely battling a gross injustice. So we are spared a similar fate but does that make me feel good? We should never have been in this mess but since we are isn,t it only right we play by the rules? Ken Bates tried to pull a flanker and was vilified for it and rightly so. As a lifelong Saints fan I just wish Lowe would sell up and let us get on with trying to clear up the momumental shambles he will have left. Saturday's game is now going to be interesting in more ways than one!

saint Compo, Winchester says...
10:56am Wed 1 Apr 09

St.Yorkie wrote:
Class - the man wouldn't know class if it smacked him in the face. Having class is more than living in Gloucester and wearing tweed, and having chums in The City! Football is a working class sport hijacked by the midle classes to exploit the "poor working class man". I don't class my self at all - just get on with it to the best of my ability. When did Rupes last do a fair days work?
So sad you have a chip on both shoulders!

Mr Melrose, hemingford abbots says...
11:06am Wed 1 Apr 09

How Bright is Rupert? Hopefully, although a dyed-in the-wool-tory-duck-h
unting-rugby-loving-
idiot he will have had enough 'people' around him to ensure that going into admin now rather than last week is not going to harm (or spell the end of) the football club - possible because I cant see a long list of buyers in these times. The possible ten points next season in div 1 may be the final nail to anyone comming forward with investment.

SaintPaul, says...
11:13am Wed 1 Apr 09

Mr Melrose wrote:
How Bright is Rupert? Hopefully, although a dyed-in the-wool-tory-duck-h unting-rugby-loving- idiot he will have had enough 'people' around him to ensure that going into admin now rather than last week is not going to harm (or spell the end of) the football club - possible because I cant see a long list of buyers in these times. The possible ten points next season in div 1 may be the final nail to anyone comming forward with investment.
Rupes is an intelligent businessman, your regular football loving director would not have been able to put this well executed plan together, I expect Lowe will set up a new company in a new name and buy Southampton Football Club back.

You won't get rid of Lowe that easily!

San Marco, says...
11:32am Wed 1 Apr 09

saint Compo wrote:
If the PLC (parent company) goes into administration, it will be the aim of its Administrator (an insolvency specilaist) to find new funding for the PLC or a buyer for the club (subsidiary company).

Unfortunately, it's not going to be easy to find either in such difficult economic times.

All those who have withheld their support of the club in the last year (by not going to games at St Mary's) should be ashamed of themselves. They are the main problem, not Lowe who has tried hard to retrieve a dreadful financial deficit situation created in the 2 years he was no longer Chairman of the PLC. This is notwithstanding his errors in the previous couple of years, especially the comings and goings of so many managers.

If our football club goes to the wall, the disaffected fans carry a huge part of the blame.

Those of you still gloating in the club's demise because you hate Lowe are fools - real fools, not just April ones.

COYR
No blame at all attached to Rupert then - all the fans' fault.

So it was the fans who made all the footballing and financial/administra
tive/management decisions over the past few months - I DIDN'T know that.

When we woke up to the news of the 'Total Football Revolution' last June we should have been blaming OURSELVES for it - I DIDN'T know that.

We, the fans, signed Pulis, I DIDN'T know that.

Lowe Luvvies will try anything to shift blame from their beloved hero - I DID know that...

Charlie George's Lawnmower, Soton says...
11:45am Wed 1 Apr 09

Why don't all the Lowe lovers set up their own football club with Rupert as chairman and manager?

He'd have total control and those love luvvies can chant is name all match every match.

Trouble is, their crowds would number about 25 maximum.

But they would have many more internet fans who defend their lord and master on every forum going, but never went to games.

St.Yorkie, Pocklington says...
11:55am Wed 1 Apr 09

saint Compo wrote:
St.Yorkie wrote: Class - the man wouldn't know class if it smacked him in the face. Having class is more than living in Gloucester and wearing tweed, and having chums in The City! Football is a working class sport hijacked by the midle classes to exploit the "poor working class man". I don't class my self at all - just get on with it to the best of my ability. When did Rupes last do a fair days work?
So sad you have a chip on both shoulders!
Yes I liked to be balanced with my views and thoughts. It's a shame we don't all put as much time into cheering the lads on at SMS - no matter what happened the Itchen Corner was always up for a fight! Not been this year true to my word - but been to away games instead. It's not pretty but unlike some I don't need the fix every week. Love football, love the Saints, but detest what one man has done to our club. Did anyone mention Delgado lately?

worried of e sussex, says...
11:58am Wed 1 Apr 09

However, BBC Sport understands that if a significant proportion of the club's debt is wiped out by such a move, it could still be at the discretion of the League whether a points penalty is imposed.
cut & paste, this reporting lark is easy!

Stafford Saint, Southampton says...
12:03pm Wed 1 Apr 09

Players have wages. Stadium has a debt to be financed. If the club wishes to remain professional and in the top half dozen or so divisions then that is fine. The club isn't the play thing of Lowe. He should not be expected to finance it himself. THE FANS DO HAVE TO CONTRIBUTE. The club needs to try to find a financial balance. It is a shame that more people don't want to pay to watch. Ergo those that don't go ARE responsible. But don't worry you are in good company - there are half a million near here that don't go! And don't worry: this type of 'responsibility' doesn't come with a punishment. Those stayaways that shy away from their degree of responsibility act defensively as if they think there are going to be put in the stocks for it! I did not punish you for Zavvi or Woolworths or that greengrocer in Woolston closing!

I just would rather that people recognise that if you don't go for long enough you kind of lose the right to define yourself as a fan.

SaintPaul, says...
12:12pm Wed 1 Apr 09

So If the debt is effectively wiped out, someone could potentially by the club for around £5m?

Any takers?

Wayne Bridge has got a few quid maybe he will buy it?

AndyAndrews, West End says...
12:23pm Wed 1 Apr 09

The club's now even more of a dead duck and laughing stock. Luckily there is an alternative: Eastleigh FC are a brilliant litle club who won again last night and seem certain to qualify for the playoffs at least en route to the Conerence National. Come and watch them!

San Marco, says...
12:23pm Wed 1 Apr 09

Stafford Saint wrote:
Players have wages. Stadium has a debt to be financed. If the club wishes to remain professional and in the top half dozen or so divisions then that is fine. The club isn't the play thing of Lowe. He should not be expected to finance it himself. THE FANS DO HAVE TO CONTRIBUTE. The club needs to try to find a financial balance. It is a shame that more people don't want to pay to watch. Ergo those that don't go ARE responsible. But don't worry you are in good company - there are half a million near here that don't go! And don't worry: this type of 'responsibility' doesn't come with a punishment. Those stayaways that shy away from their degree of responsibility act defensively as if they think there are going to be put in the stocks for it! I did not punish you for Zavvi or Woolworths or that greengrocer in Woolston closing!

I just would rather that people recognise that if you don't go for long enough you kind of lose the right to define yourself as a fan.
Who has been 'in charge' for the last few months? Who has made all the decisions? The fans or Rupert Lowe?

Supporters don't have 'rights' or 'responsibilities' beyond the ones they have as citizens and human beings. Supporters have never 'run' or made any executive decisions in relation to the club, the supporters are not paid a large salary by the club. The only actual investment that (some)supporters have in the club (other than the emotional one of course) is the owning of shares - and look how much they are worth now.

Please stop blaming everyone but your beloved hero for this...

Berkshire Saint, Wokingham says...
12:43pm Wed 1 Apr 09

Stafford Saint and Saint Compo have got it spot on. If you don't turn up and support the club, you lose the right to complain. There has been poor descision making for the past four years and both this board and the previous board are responsible but the blame isn't Rupert's alone. The stay away fans have contributed to this situation. Look at Norwich. In a similar situation to us but getting 25,000 every week which I'm sure is keeting their bank manager happy.

DinkDankDoo, Lordswood says...
12:45pm Wed 1 Apr 09

I bet all of you who say they 'will never return until Lowe is out' would be fighting for a ticket if Le Tissier became manager!

tastyted, winchester says...
12:58pm Wed 1 Apr 09

I am now very worried as the rumour from within the club a month back was that Rupert was going to take us into administration and buy the club back on the cheap , as Ken Bates did at Leeds.As a season ticket holder and fan of 46 years I will accept EVERYTHING BUT Rupert's return.

Saints since '57, Nursling says...
12:58pm Wed 1 Apr 09

Sky Sports News just reported that Lowe has met Administrators in LOndon this morning and a statement will be made tomorrow afternoon.
In the meantime its business as usaul - see you all there on Saturday?

c0rsa28, Southampton says...
1:04pm Wed 1 Apr 09

i wil still go on saturday however a loss could be simply catastrophic... i hope rupert has body gaurds because if someone finds him... need i say more

The Grinch, Marchwood says...
1:07pm Wed 1 Apr 09

It's difficult for anyone outside the club to ever fully understand what has and what hasn't actually happened here.

Some bad decisions seem to have been made at various points, but which one is the main cause? Or have they all combined to cause this mess?

It is a sad state of affairs altogether and whilst I personally see the turning point for this club's failings to be the non-reappointment of Glenn Hoddle after Strachan, who should be blamed for that? Should we blame the fans for bitterly objecting to the idea or should we blame the board for not having the testicles to make the reappointment of Hoddle despite the fans' objections? I firmly believe we would not have been relegated had Hoddle returned at that time - just look at the disasters of managers that came after Strachan. Of course we will never know whether Hoddle would have maintained our Premiership status and even if so, for how long.

Generally, it is unfair to blame 'stay away' fans because whether one is a fan or not, why should people pay good money continually (not to mention high prices) to see rubbish? Football is equally an entertainment industry as much as it is an endless passion. Fans can exist in either camp and often both. It is also worth considering that for some it is too painful to watch your team and club disintegrating in front of you. For others they simply cannot afford it.

Finally, I think we need to recognise that football has changed beyond all recognition since the 1980s and we were blessed with the services of a world class player - Matt Le Tissier - throughout the 90s and the quality and excitement he brought to the club. We were spoilt by this luxury for such a long time that once he has gone, and not replaced, a spark is missing from the club. That spark invokes passion, interest and magic - the things that bring people in - fans, other players and decent managers.

I believe there is a balance - and that is where this club has fallen down over the last few years.

St Retford, Manchester says...
1:16pm Wed 1 Apr 09

Too right you'll see me on Saturday. The most important thing is that the players don't lose focus because of this, and the best way to stop them doing that is by turning up and supporting in such numbers that all they can think about is putting in an almighty footballing performance for us.

It just might also convince someone other than Lowe to take a punt on us - after all, we're going to be in the spotlight over the next couple of weeks and it's a chance for us (the fans) to shine. Who knows, there might even be some billionaire with a penchant for yachts who'd be willing to take a punt on a football club close to where he parks his boat.

Saint, says...
1:47pm Wed 1 Apr 09

This reverse take over has never really worked for the club.

The only good which might come out of all of this, would be if a big buyer takes this chance to get a deal.

Solent Saint, Lee on the Solent says...
1:48pm Wed 1 Apr 09

That would be more support than St Yorkie and his class followers would get. Now that is a minority. Patience children, all is not lost. Support the SOS.( Saints on Saturday)

Charlie George's Lawnmower, Soton says...
1:51pm Wed 1 Apr 09

The bit about Derby is misleading.

They went into Admin in October 2003.

But the rules on points deductions didn't come into effect until the start of the 2004/05 season.

Ciaran, Southampton says...
2:40pm Wed 1 Apr 09

Charlie, you seem to be focussing on the wrong thing.

The Football League (who impose the penalties) have said TODAY that they will not be imposing a points deduction on Saints if SLH goes into administration. The League spokesman even explains the rules.

This isn't the Echo making this up - it's the Football League telling the Echo what they do in these circumstances.

The Derby thing simply explains the precedent.

End of.

Charlie George's Lawnmower, Soton says...
2:51pm Wed 1 Apr 09

Ciaran, I appreciate that, but I'm also not sure the football league spokesperson is fully aware of all the facts in respect to Saints.

For a start, the FL have given Luton a points deduction and they are owned by a holding company... who weren't even involved at the club when the problems there happened!

I do expect more to be said on this point if we(when) we go into Admin.

The BBC are already reporting the FL have dispensation to award points deductions if they feel a club is manipulating the rules to avoid points deductions!

Ciaran, Southampton says...
3:41pm Wed 1 Apr 09

Whether or not a club is owned by a holding company is not the issue here though - it's whether or not the club goes into administration.

In Saints situation, it looks like the club will not go into administration - just the holding company. At Luton, Leeds et al it was both the club AND the holding company hence the points deduction.

SLH is going into administration, not SFC. The Football League rules only concern the club going into administration.

SW11_Saint, London says...
6:31pm Wed 1 Apr 09

Treas, Sholing (Comment 10:01am Wed 1 Apr 09) - Presumably you're applauding Lowe in the same way you'd applaud someone who broke into your house, poured petrol everywhere, set it alight... and then turned up half an hour later, as it blazed away, with a bucket of water to help you put it out??!

c0rsa28, Southampton says...
6:53pm Wed 1 Apr 09

St Retford wrote:
Too right you'll see me on Saturday. The most important thing is that the players don't lose focus because of this, and the best way to stop them doing that is by turning up and supporting in such numbers that all they can think about is putting in an almighty footballing performance for us. It just might also convince someone other than Lowe to take a punt on us - after all, we're going to be in the spotlight over the next couple of weeks and it's a chance for us (the fans) to shine. Who knows, there might even be some billionaire with a penchant for yachts who'd be willing to take a punt on a football club close to where he parks his boat.
spot on i will definetly be there SFC4LIFE

TottonScrutineer, Totton says...
9:07pm Wed 1 Apr 09

Treas wrote:
Well played Rupert Lowe! Another piece of inventive business acumen.Eat your hearts out ant-Lowe brigade!
Lowe? Acumen?Where was his acumen when Strachan wanted to tkake the clubforward?Where was it when he failed to invest in a decent striker .Where was his acumen when he got his hands on the profit from players and failed to pay off the clubs debt?

TottonScrutineer, Totton says...
9:29pm Wed 1 Apr 09

saint Compo wrote:
If the PLC (parent company) goes into administration, it will be the aim of its Administrator (an insolvency specilaist) to find new funding for the PLC or a buyer for the club (subsidiary company). Unfortunately, it's not going to be easy to find either in such difficult economic times. All those who have withheld their support of the club in the last year (by not going to games at St Mary's) should be ashamed of themselves. They are the main problem, not Lowe who has tried hard to retrieve a dreadful financial deficit situation created in the 2 years he was no longer Chairman of the PLC. This is notwithstanding his errors in the previous couple of years, especially the comings and goings of so many managers. If our football club goes to the wall, the disaffected fans carry a huge part of the blame. Those of you still gloating in the club's demise because you hate Lowe are fools - real fools, not just April ones. COYR
Actually I aggree with much of the above.I though do blame the directors as whole for not having to vision and puttimg Lowe back in.Lowe has the clubs best interests at heart but has predictably become a hate figure.(wrongly in my opinion)The facts are that he was on a hiding to nothing.I agree that the stay away fans need to take a long hard look at themselves.But then the rubbish dished up for most of the season and the divisive affect of Lowe and Wilde has made them feel what is the point.Speaking as someone who has supported SFC since boyhood and I am now retired I feel we have been let down by too many takers and not enough givers at board level.But I like many others have loyally gone to SMS and paid good money only to be let down by the various boards who acted who with selfish disregard to the real fans of SFC

drfcdavid, shanklin says...
10:47pm Wed 1 Apr 09

The real damage was done when cranky ideas like bringing in Sir Clive Woodward were brought in, damaging the management structure.
However, now everyone has to put that behind them, and pull together.
Otherwise, set the satnav for Rochdale and Yeovil

soton3009, Eastleigh says...
11:05pm Wed 1 Apr 09

rupert lowe has resigned!!http://bus
iness.timesonline.co
.uk/tol/business/ind
ustry_sectors/bankin
g_and_finance/articl
e6018444.ece

SF76, says...
10:08pm Thu 2 Apr 09

It's sad it has come to this but this was always going to happen once Michael Wilde brought Lowe back. Lowe was such a divisive figure that the crowds were never going to turn up.

Now that the dark era of Lowe is finally at an end the future is looking a lot brighter.

We will find a buyer and hopefully we win our case at the FA to have the points deduction waived. I really do believe these events will have a positive effect on the field and we will stay up if 10 points aren't deducted.

Comments are closed on this article.

Daily Echo News Football League says Saints will not be deducted points

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »